Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E881C9F05 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 05:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30874 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2012 05:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30744 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2012 05:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30721 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2012 05:58:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 05:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.91.55] (HELO nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.55) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 05:58:17 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.53] by nm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2012 05:57:55 -0000 Received: from [98.138.87.3] by tm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2012 05:57:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2012 05:57:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 565941.58308.bm@omp1003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 49588 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Apr 2012 05:57:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1333259875; bh=thJkm8MD4ncqYvrmspatkXzWrN8VQWIM4jkCZ2A+JIU=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aPzBxs15kqQ+CIg0izAL6f45S9QEmI+rNOVza/dKptMtx8lYAE5sEnN28w3p4C4VrJMECWXVOvnVMc4+0J/X/TbNRaeN0a2YHhh6YCNy91GBjR5lxKBbaQJobF5ChwCX9aAZ8nvg/7Ac9S+pFwydHuVOUNsj+ivBi1z5OxDBbU8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ul/n2nE4j+VbB0GMLye7VKkcAcsGTw0rWUROR60eQXCCXetZ8SPB0RTliERj6ayfv3KbC5X2d54jzA1Vrbgx71fmw2DBq7NUDufdJHikHGFo2w17uiMHgLMe0ONX5lzmsxphG9ps5sO3oAS8Kc69EAqEgB4tmtzNboSXf/aFZ68=; X-YMail-OSG: jEyK96sVM1neJCG_VLF9bRRUfMnUSkxbXNIpIKNrpRbKUxX wB_6p3kb2sx.b66McEnzrjG29.iAOjJrmk_LjF0rF4xc2Wr91FjKh3WiE_w4 _bF5.16dzyuwRT9VyNr1RxZpfoVkxJeK7gq3QXA8kg.B5y27TFGgJMPciT1c XD_QFduncQC8mghV7RWdeweeeIOm8MuDyyiq2_xzxINW3woqsHkyYv8C8xL5 Rc9fPCcVC3la4VszyazlpU0CZ9MxqqS9YNOf4pAXlMdc0d5v_LLtse6Ysti5 9OrwHF7dd9l83x1xqEQCJ14tmxGZpL0L7VnzmLM5D5T2dAc_JxnEngP844p0 XfofGpK2.13eoN1xz2XIyWdsiqpip7_snxnTmKzA689Aqf4GF4_iVY94mah6 oRMqxFFrhHNSo6lUr8cPKCHyo._2OUyI.jw4H.chNEg_kp3qDH83RL_nFxEZ GTw-- Received: from [69.181.180.38] by web121702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:57:55 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 Message-ID: <1333259875.18636.YahooMailNeo@web121702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:57:55 -0700 (PDT) From: lars hofhansl Reply-To: lars hofhansl Subject: JIRA funkiness? To: hbase-dev MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="896913286-1625437989-1333259875=:18636" --896913286-1625437989-1333259875=:18636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I changed a bunch of jiras from 0.94.1 to 0.94.0 and jira search as well as the release notes still have these marked as 0.94.1. (I.e. release notes for 0.94.0 do not contain them, and a search for fixversion = 0.94.1 still shows them). In this expected? Do I need to wait for a re-index? -- Lars --896913286-1625437989-1333259875=:18636--