Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <004801cd0197$1cde69c0$569b3d40$%vasudevan@huawei.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgFr2SeUnROSmePgV68nPSi8hoWz-pMPd4WAJFUvUZZHYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62xwsNUrjV5+bktn52qP+qmhxPVHHd51TUK1-7gJ0dfvQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgH+cmmAqqy89+DdHhmvaQ=rw_-d-zoDssrwQj==PsVZPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62yQY50E9F9P8t5LBtSqa4FJBDkqJU_aFY6qzD41DiLT0g@mail.gmail.com>
	<004801cd0197$1cde69c0$569b3d40$%vasudevan@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:51:27 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62yuQ_4k-VEDpCmywur+4_=Z9ZPWi+jF5ehb=7GYsj=C=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for
 download
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0418263874ea6604bb2cba7e

--f46d0418263874ea6604bb2cba7e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Just curious:
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23/configurehas
the following parameters:
-U clean -Dmaven.test.redirectTestOutputToFile=true -Dhadoop.profile=23
site assembly:assembly

HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23 build has never been green.

So ?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> We tried out 0.92.1 with Hadoop-0.23.1 and it worked fine.
>
> Tried out things like bulk load, puts, scans on around 1000 regions
> including some long runs.  It turned out to be fine.  If running with
> 0.23.1
> is ok this RC am  +1.
>
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:04 AM
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available
> > for download
> >
> > I assume we should use 'mvn -Dhadoop.profile=22' to build HBase jar for
> > deployment.
> >
> > Since it would be a different jar, I wonder whether the vote would
> > count.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I wanted to validate this release.
> > > > But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
> > > >
> > > > Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure
> > what to
> > > do
> > > > here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Download the tar ball, replace the bundled hadoop under the lib dir
> > > with your hadoop 0.22 version and then run it on an hadoop 0.22
> > > cluster?  If its as good/bad as 0.92.x, you should be able to +1.
> > See
> > > end of this section: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
>
>

--f46d0418263874ea6604bb2cba7e--