Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcMMgFr2SeUnROSmePgV68nPSi8hoWz-pMPd4WAJFUvUZZHYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgFr2SeUnROSmePgV68nPSi8hoWz-pMPd4WAJFUvUZZHYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:03:49 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62xwsNUrjV5+bktn52qP+qmhxPVHHd51TUK1-7gJ0dfvQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for
 download
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04447f477d89fd04bb2b39ae

--f46d04447f477d89fd04bb2b39ae
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I wanted to validate this release.
But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22

Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure what to do
here.

Cheers

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
>
> I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
>
> This is for the most part a bug fix release.   Here is what has been fixed
> since 0.92.0:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
>
> You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1?  Take it for a spin.
> Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
>
> Yours,
> St.Ack
>

--f46d04447f477d89fd04bb2b39ae--