Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 969219B03 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20605 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2012 01:29:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20378 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2012 01:29:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20370 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2012 01:29:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.41] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com) (209.85.215.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:29:07 +0000 Received: by lagz14 with SMTP id z14so2614957lag.14 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:28:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qCKSmknK0MZqwIg8rtMPB/5ZNNxcY/DrC4zYHpZ3Zfg=; b=ZN30nAuBLXM3vrqstHOcAZu8fX5VNiT7l++8YunJ43BgT+fd78LS3tDtzzDIxNLPV6 G5rKvmwxwjBsT8w9RZE+V+DzV3YEaGSX89Y+n3p+TbyhHaEIPJTteuhb4M+Ln77ArPe2 obpgApmgMKvb77Adtiv1rre7XJGitwv35ymU0MdbU9BMpNazbcf6tWr+VuoNtfaLcCI5 pw7fEnG/5dyWcRv/6vfHofIblqxjcF556ycdHqf2F7WCC5JZbQKC3y5AqMC6W7IkKiaP n6oWyBi/64hDZaKyDOk+Q4sFOfEzRMPPqwtruFR8jlQirU9GU9oJ5exQAbef7Zi8OYDh KzLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.105.19 with SMTP id gi19mr25405907lab.11.1332984526019; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.80.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:28:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1332984363.16930.YahooMailNeo@web121704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1332916103.54372.YahooMailNeo@web121706.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1332984363.16930.YahooMailNeo@web121704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:28:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for download From: Ted Yu To: dev@hbase.apache.org, lars hofhansl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040716e12a1cf304bc57a58f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d040716e12a1cf304bc57a58f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The second scenario. Thanks On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:26 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > HBASE-5258 is not in 0.94. Did you mean a different one? > > Or are you saying that you deployed HBASE-5258 locally to your 0.92 > version, and that that was the reason you could not test rolling upgrade to > 0.94? > > Thanks. > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:11 PM > Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available > for download > > The change was for HBASE-5258 > > Incompatibility was expected. > > Thanks > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Stack wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > I planned to perform rolling restart from (our variant of) 0.92 to > 0.94.0 > > > but found out that some internal changes prevented region server to > talk > > to > > > 0.94.0 master. > > > > What changes? Do you have logs from that time? > > St.Ack > > > --f46d040716e12a1cf304bc57a58f--