Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5729F99A5 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73036 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 01:29:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 72980 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 01:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 72970 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 01:29:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:29:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of joey@cloudera.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.169] (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.217.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:28:57 +0000 Received: by lbbgf7 with SMTP id gf7so12126lbb.14 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:28:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=z0u1vemLe1R1TnaEJjdPY47iwFIH5KFOAOl21YjccEM=; b=SDHkCVbLpAypFuhDrMUKPHOkI2Xwo9vfpAp7uYrcugVcMJWt8l7uO8I1if3vb4Qptq D9byofCT+E6oOC1fX0yyWyNk5I5szP935E9r+cETUk/KcGqJMDdhDsLwuepAazU4u7RF Yul7lOpJqUH3RR3jW/ifFrneZwj0R8nC2u5kuU3jA3RPtwB12xP4d+JYxlQLvrVS1E67 fFxU3R570C0bT6OXcscptxzQgN3rRxVyNnGewcqABEDHptb7RI7Z99UyyXbw8hACrzD7 1E1MceLk3nPyelUN0SnQTFEP3eVsFKq+FLYKJQq7+UV/ZD/XpwK6MwHShWf7PV/FgVrE ixMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.38.97 with SMTP id f1mr5301116lbk.33.1331602116879; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.94.163 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:28:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331598576.76731.YahooMailNeo@web121701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1331353980.20900.YahooMailNeo@web121704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1331598576.76731.YahooMailNeo@web121701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:28:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94 From: Joey Echeverria To: dev@hbase.apache.org, lars hofhansl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjv+hyRgAAOLyQmICdV5hoRnPRCNLmLXn8hu3nvY90UVze4d5MU5uRy16K8nyEEf7CETfQ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:29 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > I think this is a great idea. > > Should we adopt this here? > I'm +1. Who else? > > > -- Lars > > > ________________________________ > =A0From: Harsh J > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM > Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94 > > Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix > vs. Targeted branch versions? > > Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUs= iv1 > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl wro= te: >> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were mark= ed with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed= . >> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at = through the jira issues. >> >> I would like to request to either: >> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or >> >> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or >> >> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to = 0.94) >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Lars >> > > > > -- > Harsh J --=20 Joseph Echeverria Cloudera, Inc. 443.305.9434