Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A4519C41 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18513 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 03:22:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 18218 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 03:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 18183 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 03:22:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:22:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.169] (HELO mail-vx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:22:28 +0000 Received: by vcbfk14 with SMTP id fk14so170349vcb.14 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:22:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XSeLLZUi0u723drTGswIvSVxKH708u3mbpYILiIA7YI=; b=nZIOS/9G0Tj30XBu8spl8q0DDBZ3JXVUEI5i8IY6K7+P5Qn50O7zjTe0wISdI0JgYE xzgcEEXDSbcwaQkk6EzReRGqGByBAM4wEk6ADsDD18akaqFF7T9kNs8qsZlPon4LGxsI Tu4HKWljZVcixoA8KHsDYY2hD8YKZUAunV2oc2gYQg7Ib9zQTP4RPjPpsi2sOqW/PDh6 T/btRQ882hNlns3GmwSdI03An0SgBurtSU/THpPOqKACZ10e5LLc9Tz/3WY8SoCZBJMQ ARIfFdWMIfWyLJpB0WNXv2Q/PxXru2vHv6aepml77wROnw3rHgCwsan0GmRzcU2/DL+L O+dA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.99.231 with SMTP id et7mr15948206vdb.114.1331608927667; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.149.129 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:22:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331598576.76731.YahooMailNeo@web121701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1331353980.20900.YahooMailNeo@web121704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1331598576.76731.YahooMailNeo@web121701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:22:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xx2BmijqzcljUkb7MJjijiMFV1U Message-ID: Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94 From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org, lars hofhansl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds good to me (not sure how to add it but between a bunch of us, we should be able to figure it out). St.Ack On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:29 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > I think this is a great idea. > > Should we adopt this here? > I'm +1. Who else? > > > -- Lars > > > ________________________________ > =A0From: Harsh J > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM > Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94 > > Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix > vs. Targeted branch versions? > > Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUs= iv1 > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl wro= te: >> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were mark= ed with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed= . >> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at = through the jira issues. >> >> I would like to request to either: >> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or >> >> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or >> >> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to = 0.94) >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Lars >> > > > > -- > Harsh J