Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E8B897E5 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50451 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 15:59:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 50390 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 15:59:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 31201 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2012 08:11:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lakshman.ch@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.64 as permitted sender) Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:33:14 +0530 From: Laxman Subject: RE: HBase 0.92 with Hadoop 0.23.1 In-reply-to: X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.98] To: 'Todd Lipcon' , dev@hbase.apache.org Reply-to: lakshman.ch@huawei.com Message-id: <000601ccfb6f$95ac9940$c105cbc0$%ch@huawei.com> Organization: htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en-us Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: Acz7aJOySJ1Q3ZMWS5SspXzAKEb9twABW0yw X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: <000001ccfb5c$630d49c0$2927dd40$%ch@huawei.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for your quick inputs Todd. We also will be contributing & testing this combination (HBase 0.92 + Hadoop 0.23.x) I will be happy to share any load and contribute to make this ready for production. -- Regards, Laxman > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 12:42 PM > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lakshman.ch@huawei.com > Subject: Re: HBase 0.92 with Hadoop 0.23.1 > > Hi Laxman, > > We've been testing this combination (more or less) as part of our CDH4 > beta testing efforts. So far, pretty good results, but keep in mind > both releases are classified as alpha/beta at this point. So I > wouldn't recommend it for a production use case unless you have a long > burn-in cycle to gain confidence first. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Laxman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Anyone using HBase 0.92 with 0.23.1 in your clusters. > > We are planning to use this combination in our clusters to take the > > advantage of new hadoop features and improvements. > > Please give opinion on this (any known issues, suggestions). > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Laxman > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera