hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Wang <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Commits to 0.94
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:42:25 GMT
I think this idea is good as well.

- Dave

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> Sounds good to me (not sure how to add it but between a bunch of us,
> we should be able to figure it out).
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:29 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > I think this is a great idea.
> >
> > Should we adopt this here?
> > I'm +1. Who else?
> >
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com>
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94
> >
> > Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
> > vs. Targeted branch versions?
> >
> > Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were
> marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as
> fixed.
> >> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at
> through the jira issues.
> >>
> >> I would like to request to either:
> >> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
> >>
> >> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
> >>
> >> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to
> 0.94)
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> -- Lars
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Harsh J
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message