hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Wang <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: HBase 0.92 with Hadoop 0.23.1
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:05:58 GMT
Laxman,

If you have any test scripts you can share with us, we'd appreciate it,
especially in some of the new areas that 0.92 + 0.23 covers.

- Dave

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Laxman <lakshman.ch@huawei.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your quick inputs Todd.
> We also will be contributing & testing this combination (HBase 0.92 +
> Hadoop
> 0.23.x)
> I will be happy to share any load and contribute to make this ready for
> production.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Laxman
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 12:42 PM
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lakshman.ch@huawei.com
> > Subject: Re: HBase 0.92 with Hadoop 0.23.1
> >
> > Hi Laxman,
> >
> > We've been testing this combination (more or less) as part of our CDH4
> > beta testing efforts. So far, pretty good results, but keep in mind
> > both releases are classified as alpha/beta at this point. So I
> > wouldn't recommend it for a production use case unless you have a long
> > burn-in cycle to gain confidence first.
> >
> > -Todd
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Laxman <lakshman.ch@huawei.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Anyone using HBase 0.92 with 0.23.1 in your clusters.
> > > We are planning to use this combination in our clusters to take the
> > > advantage of new hadoop features and improvements.
> > > Please give opinion on this (any known issues, suggestions).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Laxman
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Todd Lipcon
> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message