hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: Commits to 0.94
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:22:07 GMT
Sounds good to me (not sure how to add it but between a bunch of us,
we should be able to figure it out).

St.Ack

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:29 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think this is a great idea.
>
> Should we adopt this here?
> I'm +1. Who else?
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94
>
> Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix
> vs. Targeted branch versions?
>
> Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix
Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed.
>> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the
jira issues.
>>
>> I would like to request to either:
>> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or
>>
>> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or
>>
>> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94)
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J

Mime
View raw message