Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOmV22vy5HgzH0h81-etoogDDW0P2m2zs3Dnbu=Z_MiEurk5jQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOmV22v2bBy7mHopMENqg2LyQoKvgfQKWSF17MRy9y8CYk2ung@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62wychtmpeLhVu7__pgY3x_902a8axK=_b-eh=ejH_6A1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOmV22v7KSnx+wNrExBUSdOBjZ_og9N+-q0p7f8BcJnPDZhtfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62wTU=7LA-YdkbtchV_uv_V8K8Mr3Ar+3-tAHzfiGrxbtQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62zWSM2SZL2gk2An6v1rH4pUv-F0N+pvmPNkDMhNX3FieQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOmV22vy5HgzH0h81-etoogDDW0P2m2zs3Dnbu=Z_MiEurk5jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:07:51 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62zWcPZjh71F4wyozt1hy-XvX4kFubSBifONVsn-mB3cEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HBase wire compatibility
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04c5a08dcc04b8dfb5bc

--0016e6de04c5a08dcc04b8dfb5bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

HADOOP-7379 was marked resolved for 0.23

Does this imply that hadoop 0.23 or above must be used ?
If so, we'd better state that on the wiki.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Sure.  I will add that.  To me, HBASE-5306 is more about the RPC engine.
> It can evolve in parallel since the current HBase RPC
> can support PB already due to
> HADOOP-7379<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's the first bullet under Phase I.
> >
> > Can you mention HBASE-5306 there ?
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > What's the role of HBASE-5306 in your proposal ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I posted the proposal on wiki:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseWireCompatibility
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Jimmy
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Can you post on wiki ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Attachment stripped.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hello,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > As HBase installation base is getting bigger, we are ready to work
> > on
> > >> the
> > >> > > wire compatibility issue.
> > >> > > The goal is to make HBase easier for operators to upgrade, while
> it
> > is
> > >> > > also easier for developers to
> > >> > > enhance, re-architect if necessary.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The attached is a proposal we came up.  We'd like to start with
> two
> > >> > phases:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Phase 1: Compatibility between client applications and HBase
> > clusters
> > >> > > Phase 2: HBase cluster rolling upgrade within same major version
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Could you please review?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > > Jimmy
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

--0016e6de04c5a08dcc04b8dfb5bc--