Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates
 10.60.12.103 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.12.103;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CB6D1A14.296DF%thpan@ebay.com>
References: <CB616A2C.2820F%thpan@ebay.com>
	<CB6D1A14.296DF%thpan@ebay.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:54:50 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CADcMMgEehkLO8s3n6u6d0Yw9=6uGrEYyUXU-ZgH_r6cKhtuNiw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Scan performance on a big table as combination of multiple logic
 tables
From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Pan, Thomas <thpan@ebay.com> wrote:
>
> Just a quick heads-up. Ted pointed me to this jira:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5416
> Max (the author) has confirmed that the patch provides what I want. :-)
>

What do you think about what Mikhael says on the end?  Have you tried
doing two scans; one for the work to do and then another to do the
work?

St.Ack