Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAha9a2TPro9_o+n4omR+bSVtfuiqSXFF9KLp_gab=+2gM4-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <4D5F4595A9AA3746AA71BCD650058F8B01CC32FD@szxeml533-mbs.china.huawei.com>
 <CAAha9a3jp18EbzEJ42mBrYjVWSVSQHsASfevepYgxsygFSbv_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgGBipFW4ywuX2t9NaaChHWk9h1_wpQ8sp27OUyFyEqm4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAha9a2TPro9_o+n4omR+bSVtfuiqSXFF9KLp_gab=+2gM4-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:47:38 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAAha9a0Cr-PqH+-at-YcD1GnNgNqf+MuPFMk93Kta+11=hhEbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ANN: 0.90.6 RC3 available for download
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f83a99f45f98c04b88ac67a

--e89a8f83a99f45f98c04b88ac67a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I've filed a jira to add rat check to the build
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5363

And to fix the licenses:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5364

I plan on implementing them when I get in to the office today.

Jon.

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > I was reading into what goes into a release, and based on this I think
>> of
>> > have to -1 the release from an admin point of view.
>> > - mvn rat:check looks like it has problems (there are also some in the
>> > 0.92.0 release) -- attached to this email.
>>
>>
>> I went through a few.  Looks like its complaining mostly because of
>> empty files, files it can't read the apache license in (because its
>> got xml preamble), etc.  I'd say this is important but my guess is
>> that 0.90.5 wasn't much better.  I'd suggest we could file an issue to
>> fix this in 0.90.7/0.92.1 but that maybe its not enough to sink the
>> release?
>>
>>
> I chatted with some of the apache veterans, and I'm going to stand by the
> -1 unless the licenses are fixed.  It should be trivial fix.
>
>  See this: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> "What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?"
>
> That said, release votes are by majority, and there is no veto:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> Jon.
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
>
>


-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com

--e89a8f83a99f45f98c04b88ac67a--