Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221869F92 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59415 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 04:28:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58669 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 04:28:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58615 invoked by uid 99); 29 Feb 2012 04:28:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:28:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.64 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.64] (HELO szxga01-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:28:41 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0M0500LLI0F7B7@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for dev@hbase.apache.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0M0500B6B0F7T9@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for dev@hbase.apache.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml209-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AHM25731; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:19 +0800 Received: from SZXEML422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.161) by szxeml209-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.184) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:27:46 +0800 Received: from blrprnc05ns (10.18.96.94) by szxeml422-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:13 +0800 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:12 +0530 From: "Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan" Subject: FW: FW: ANN:0.90.6RC4 available for download X-Originating-IP: [10.18.96.94] To: dev@hbase.apache.org Message-id: <003501ccf69a$8c9715d0$a5c54170$%vasudevan@huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en-us Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: Acz2mC3BDRZZryI4SRKVQc0+CVsPZgAAS+JA X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Stack Thanks for your reply. If we move the enum to the last then rolling restart with patch on master and not on RS will work. But the same thing tried out in the reverse like patch on RS and not on master will not work. So rolling restart means first apply patch on master and then on RS right? If so am ok with moving it down. I was going thro the roling restart script and found it is the master that is restarted first. Could you confirm on this ? Regards Ram -----Original Message----- From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:39 AM To: dev@hbase.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: ANN:0.90.6RC4 available for download On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan wrote: > Hi Devs > > I would revert the fix for HBASE-5379 and leave the patch in the JIRA incase > someone needs it or we later take it in 0.90.7. > Thats fine Ram. Or you could do as you suggested and move the new enum to the end of the enum list. St.Ack