hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HBase wire compatibility
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:01:44 GMT
I found that my flight back to US arrives at SFO @ 12:55pm on 21st.

If there is no way to move the meetup a little later, I will have to pass
this one.

Cheers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Count me in for 21st.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Gregory Chanan <gchanan@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I think it would be good to have a swat team for discussing the open
>> issues
>> > and planning.  In the interest of discussing this while it is fresh in
>> > everyone's mind, how about setting up a swat team at Cloudera Palo Alto
>> (210
>> > Portage Avenue) soon?
>> >
>> > How about either:
>> > 1) Thursday Feb 16th @ 3:30 PM - 5:30 PM
>> > 2) Tuesday Feb 21st @ 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM
>>
>> +1 for 2/21
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > > It is a good idea to swat team it or hackathon.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > Little code has been written at hackathons in the past so it would
>> >> > need to have a bit of a different format.
>> >> >
>> >> > Or we just divvy up the work (I could do the migration of .META. and
>> >> > -ROOT- to pb and of zk persistence to pb if wanted).
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> That's great!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > > We'd like to start with phase 1 at first, then phase 2.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The purpose is to reduce/eliminate the operation interruption.
 We
>> need
>> >> > to
>> >> > > start from somewhere.
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > Agree.
>> >> >
>> >> > Phase 2 seems just as bad as a disruption as phase 1 or am I reading
>> >> > it wrong; i.e. its another singularity that can't be crossed w/o a
>> >> > restart of all servers.
>> >> >
>> >> > I suppose I'm wondering if we think we can nail phase 1 and phase 2
>> >> > within a single release cycle; then the two singularities are
>> >> > experienced as one during a single upgrade.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Yes, if we can finish both in one release cycle.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Jimmy
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > St.Ack
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message