hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Hsieh <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: ANN: 0.90.6 RC3 available for download
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:30:51 GMT
Ram,

Sounds perfect.

You've asked to freeze the 0.90 branch.  Is it cool if I commit two
rat/license related patches onto the 0.90 branch later today?  (I'm going
to be away from computer for a few weeks -- long needed vacation).

Jon.

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Jon
>
> First of all thanks a lot for working on the license issues.
>
> As discussed with Stack the key signing part he said he can do it.
> Currently for the 0.90.6RC3 only you have voted.  I received 2 +1s on RC2
> only.
> If you can commit your changes once again we can take another RC for 0.90.6
> but it may delay the release further.
> So in another 2 days we get more +1s then we go ahead with this Rc3,  if
> not
> take another RC with your recent JIRAs and release that one.
>
> Does that sound ok ? Good on you Jon.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Hsieh [mailto:jon@cloudera.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:54 AM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANN: 0.90.6 RC3 available for download
>
> Hey Ram,
>
> You are the release manager so you get to decide if on the status of the
> 0.90.6 release. I believe we have a workaround for the key signing bit.  I
> believe the rules say a sufficient condition for a release is to have at
> least 3 formal pmc +1's as long as there are more +1's than -1's.  (There
> is no veto on releases).
>
> I've created patches that make rat run when you add a -Prelease profile to
> the 0.90.x build and also a patch the fixes the licenses making rat pass.
>  If these are applied my current -1 vote will turn into a +1.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5363 (takes 0.92 and trunk as
> well)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5377
>
> Also, the license fixes for 0.92/trunk were fairly trivial and I'll give
> Elliot credit for them on that patch:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5364
>
> Jon.
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've filed a jira to add rat check to the build
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5363
> >
> > And to fix the licenses:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5364
> >
> > I plan on implementing them when I get in to the office today.
> >
> > Jon.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > I was reading into what goes into a release, and based on this I
> think
> >>> of
> >>> > have to -1 the release from an admin point of view.
> >>> > - mvn rat:check looks like it has problems (there are also some in
> the
> >>> > 0.92.0 release) -- attached to this email.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I went through a few.  Looks like its complaining mostly because of
> >>> empty files, files it can't read the apache license in (because its
> >>> got xml preamble), etc.  I'd say this is important but my guess is
> >>> that 0.90.5 wasn't much better.  I'd suggest we could file an issue to
> >>> fix this in 0.90.7/0.92.1 but that maybe its not enough to sink the
> >>> release?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I chatted with some of the apache veterans, and I'm going to stand by
> the
> >> -1 unless the licenses are fixed.  It should be trivial fix.
> >>
> >>  See this: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> >> "What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?"
> >>
> >> That said, release votes are by majority, and there is no veto:
> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> Jon.
> >> --
> >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> // jon@cloudera.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // jon@cloudera.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
>


-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message