Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 550BC91AF for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79319 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 12:50:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 79260 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 12:50:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 79252 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2012 12:50:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:50:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.169] (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:50:07 +0000 Received: by iadk27 with SMTP id k27so993236iad.14 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.142.129 with SMTP id s1mr1577733icu.42.1327582187263; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:49:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.33.129 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:49:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D5F4595A9AA3746AA71BCD650058F8B01CC07E1@szxeml533-mbs.china.huawei.com> <77E4913F-32FF-45AC-875A-7532166D82A8@gmail.com> <4D5F4595A9AA3746AA71BCD650058F8B01CC08D9@szxeml533-mbs.china.huawei.com> From: Jonathan Hsieh Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:49:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 0.90.6 Release status To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8ce2ae969404b76dd062 --90e6ba6e8ce2ae969404b76dd062 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Ram, I'm still interested in the 0.90 branch and will spend some time testing the RC. Keep up the good work! Jon. On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > (Coming in a little late, sorry about that) > > If HBASE-5196 is a regression from previous versions, then definitely > -1. If not, I don't see why we'd sink the RC and even more so since it > has no unit test which means it could add more bugs to a bug fix > release. > > That said, you guys can still -1 this RC if you want. > > Personally I'm done with the 0.90 branch and I'm focussing my efforts > on getting 0.92 in production here. > > J-D > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan > wrote: > > It is always better to get in a patch with test case. But if it takes > a little more time to get the test case can we verify the patch with good > cluster testing and raise a JIRA for the test case integration that Stack > gives. > > > > By this way we can get the patch in the release and also satisfies > Todd's suggestion. > > > > Any comments so that i can raise a test task for the same. > > > > Regards > > Ram > > ________________________________________ > > From: yuzhihong@gmail.com [yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:13 PM > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > > Cc: dev@hbase.apache.org > > Subject: Re: 0.90.6 Release status > > > > Stack said he would come up with some test for hbase-5179. > > Suppose that takes a few more days, do you plan to check in the fix into > 0.90 branch ? > > > > According to Todd's suggestion earlier, a Jira shouldn't be open for too > long during which time patches continuously get checked in. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan < > ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Devs > >> > >> After the first RC for 0.90.6 was taken > >> HBASE-5196 - Failure in region split after PONR could cause region hole > >> HBASE-5153 - Add retry logic in > HConnectionImplementation#resetZooKeeperTrackers > >> > >> The above 2 defects have been committed. > >> > >> HBASE-5179 - Concurrent processing of processFaileOver and > ServerShutdownHandler may cause region to be assigned before log splitting > is completed, causing data loss > >> HBASE-5225 - Backport HBASE-3845 -data loss because lastSeqWritten can > miss memstore edits > >> HBASE-5235 - HLogSplitter writer thread's streams not getting closed > when any of the writer threads has exceptions. > >> HBASE-5237 - Addendum for HBASE-5160 and HBASE-4397 > >> > >> HBASE-5179 - is almost in a final stage for committing. Thanks to > Chunhui, Ted and Jinchao for persisting on the defect. > >> > >> The above defects were found during the testing for RC0. Hence i would > like to cut another RC once the above > >> defects goes into 0.90. By tomorrow 22nd January i would like to take > a release cut. > >> Please let me know your suggestions/opinions. > >> > >> Regards > >> Ram > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // jon@cloudera.com --90e6ba6e8ce2ae969404b76dd062--