Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender)
References: 
 <4D5F4595A9AA3746AA71BCD650058F8B01CC07E1@szxeml533-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <4D5F4595A9AA3746AA71BCD650058F8B01CC07E1@szxeml533-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <77E4913F-32FF-45AC-875A-7532166D82A8@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
From: yuzhihong@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 0.90.6 Release status
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:43:17 -0800
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>

Stack said he would come up with some test for hbase-5179.=20
Suppose that takes a few more days, do you plan to check in the fix into 0.9=
0 branch ?

According to Todd's suggestion earlier, a Jira shouldn't be open for too lon=
g during which time patches continuously get checked in.=20

Cheers


On Jan 21, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan <ramkrishna.vasudevan@h=
uawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Devs
>=20
> After the first RC for 0.90.6 was taken
> HBASE-5196 - Failure in region split after PONR could cause region hole
> HBASE-5153 - Add retry logic in HConnectionImplementation#resetZooKeeperTr=
ackers
>=20
> The above 2 defects have been committed.
>=20
> HBASE-5179 - Concurrent processing of processFaileOver and ServerShutdownH=
andler may cause region to be assigned before log splitting is completed, ca=
using data loss
> HBASE-5225 - Backport HBASE-3845 -data loss because lastSeqWritten can mis=
s memstore edits
> HBASE-5235 - HLogSplitter writer thread's streams not getting closed when a=
ny of the writer threads has exceptions.
> HBASE-5237 - Addendum for HBASE-5160 and HBASE-4397
>=20
> HBASE-5179 - is almost in a final stage for committing.  Thanks to Chunhui=
, Ted and Jinchao for persisting on the defect.
>=20
> The above defects were found during the testing for RC0. Hence i would lik=
e to cut another RC once the above
> defects goes into 0.90.  By tomorrow 22nd January i would like to take a r=
elease cut.
> Please let me know your suggestions/opinions.
>=20
> Regards
> Ram