Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=YdfAacj1pTomFUG9sfjnU7fiSSeUkpiI3lA8SCq8Y2obkc9XHBRA0oU64LHzbAbl10PYHx6DUv9xzRj45IV5Xi0MrXbyxuquOipo17eQfrQ8PIoWTDqIZFU8aa6tFVLZagHvSpvHS6S7g+YkCD4N7vjr6kIeIQMSLah3BkgmRYg=;
References: 
 <CALte62wcKNEhJ7xQbbDF=JeXvZWNyqsQYd=tA3E30O__oyYSfw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1327122391.64483.YahooMailNeo@web121703.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:06:31 -0800 (PST)
From: lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: time based release Was: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport
 HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.92
To: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>,
  "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>, stack <stack@duboce.net>,
  Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALte62wcKNEhJ7xQbbDF=JeXvZWNyqsQYd=tA3E30O__oyYSfw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="1001534069-1083582346-1327122391=:64483"

--1001534069-1083582346-1327122391=:64483
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Absolutely. I'd also throw HBASE-4608 in there.=0A=0A=0A=0A________________=
________________=0A From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>=0ATo: dev@hbase.apac=
he.org; lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com> =0ACc: Todd Lipcon <todd@cloude=
ra.com>; stack <stack@duboce.net>; Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@gmail.com> =
=0ASent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:55 PM=0ASubject: time based release Was=
: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to=
 0.92=0A =0A=0AI suggest first completing HBASE-2600 and HBASE-4218 before =
branching 0.94=0AWe have 5 Jenkins builds so far. After branching, we need =
to maintain 5 Jenkins builds.=0A=0ACheers=0A=0A=0AOn Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8=
:33 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0AI agree. As soon as=
 0.92.0 is released, let's talk about 0.94.=0A>=0A>+1 on time based release=
s!=0A>=0A>=0A>I think 0.92 shows that not doing frequent releases leads to =
a lot cruft accumulating in trunk, which then takes a lot of time to stabal=
ize.=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>________________________________=0A>=A0From: Todd L=
ipcon <todd@cloudera.com>=0A>To: dev@hbase.apache.org=0A>Cc: stack <stack@d=
uboce.net>; lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>; Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcrya=
ns@gmail.com>=0A>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:07 AM=0A>Subject: Re: co=
de review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.9=
2=0A>=0A>=0A>On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>=
 wrote:=0A>> I made Fix Version of HBASE-5231 0.92.1=0A>>=0A>> I can wait t=
ill 0.92.0 is released.=0A>=0A>IMO we should push it to 0.94.0. Point relea=
ses should be for minor=0A>improvements and bug fixes. The fact that we div=
ert so much energy=0A>into past releases is part of why we're so slow to re=
lease the new=0A>ones -- and the long period between the new releases I thi=
nk=0A>contributes to how unstable trunk gets in the meantime. I won't -1 it=
=0A>for 0.92.1, but it just seems like a Bad Idea.=0A>=0A>/me goes back to =
beating the 'we should do time-based releases' drum=0A>=0A>-Todd=0A>=0A>>=
=0A>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wro=
te:=0A>>=0A>>> Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk abo=
ut putting=0A>>> more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on f=
or months=0A>>> because we can't seem to say "no".=0A>>>=0A>>> Todd=0A>>>=
=0A>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:=
=0A>>> > Hi,=0A>>> > The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup toni=
ght told me that=0A>>> they=0A>>> > once thought of allocating one cluster =
per table - just to keep regions=0A>>> in=0A>>> > each table balanced.=0A>>=
> >=0A>>> > With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.=0A>>> >=0A>=
>> > Please review the patch.=0A>>> >=0A>>> > Thanks=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>=
> --=0A>>> Todd Lipcon=0A>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera=0A>>>=0A>=0A>=0A>=
=0A>--=0A>Todd Lipcon=0A>Software Engineer, Cloudera
--1001534069-1083582346-1327122391=:64483--