hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ANN: The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:13:47 GMT
Lars:
runAllTests profile is only in TRUNK.
'mvn clean test' should be the command for 0.92

Cheers

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Lars George <lars.george@gmail.com> wrote:

> I checked the MD5 and SHA-1 hashes, which are all OK, I did get an error
> though on my MBA (see below). Assuming this is only me I am also +1.
>
> Here is the test failure:
>
> ...
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperACL
> 2012-01-15 01:52:46.002 java[49123:1903] Unable to load realm info from
> SCDynamicStore
> 2012-01-15 01:52:48.715 java[49123:1e807] Unable to load realm info from
> SCDynamicStore
> Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 44.246 sec
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperMainServerArg
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.376 sec
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperNodeTracker
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.129 sec
>
> Results :
>
> Failed tests:
> testCyclicReplication(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestMasterReplication):
> Waited too much time for put replication
>
> Tests in error:
>  testSimplePutDelete(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestMasterReplication):
> Cluster already running at
> /Users/larsgeorge/Downloads/hbase-0.92.0-rc3/hbase-0.92.0/target/test-data/7956128b-c9e3-4473-b3a2-c2faf140fb99/dfscluster_80ddefc2-e1be-477f-b761-df1ed883fc31
>
> Tests run: 1037, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 2:57:25.455s
> [INFO] Finished at: Sun Jan 15 01:53:33 CET 2012
> [INFO] Final Memory: 108M/213M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [WARNING] The requested profile "runAllTests" could not be activated
> because it does not exist.
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.10:test (default-test) on
> project hbase: Failure or timeout -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> -e switch.
> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> please read the following articles:
> [ERROR] [Help 1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
>
> Did I run this wrong? What about the "runAllTests" warning above?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
> On Jan 8, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-3/
> >
> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
> >
> > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0 and zookeeper 3.4.2.
> >
> > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a wagon-load of new features
> > including coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format,
> > distributed log splitting, etc.  There's been > 660 fixes since 0.90.
> > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5
> >
> > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this
> > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> >
> > There is no migration necessary.  A shutdown and restart after putting
> > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart
> > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work).  That said, once you have moved
> > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has
> > been made.
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0?  Take it for a spin.
> > Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by Martin Luther King Day, January 16th,
> 2012.
> >
> > Yours,
> > The HBasistas
> >
> > P.S. This candidate is looking pretty good.  If you are thinking of
> using 0.92.0
> > any time soon, we would suggest that you dig in now and try it.  Thanks.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message