hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:06:29 GMT
HBASE-5099, 5100 were integrated after this RC.
Also, Prakash has new patch for HBASE-5081.

I think a new RC should be more appropriate for the first 0.92 release.

Cheers

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:

> Now that both Hadoop 1.0 and ZK 3.4.2 have been released I think we
> should ship with them.
>
> Apart from that I'm +1. I even let a LoadTester job run on my 15 nodes
> during the holidays (287 hours now) and it's still crushing my cluster
> as much as it did in the beginning without any failure.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-2/
> >
> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
> >
> > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0rc3 and zookeeper 3.4.2rc0.
> >
> > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a raft of new features
> > including: coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format,
> > distributed log splitting, etc.  There's been > 600 fixes since 0.90.
> > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5
> >
> > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this
> > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> >
> > There is no migration necessary.  A shutdown and restart after putting
> > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart
> > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work).  That said, once you have moved
> > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has
> > been made.
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0?  Take it for a spin.
> > Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by January 3rd, 2012.
> >
> > Happy Holidays.
> > Yours,
> > The HBasistas
> >
> > P.S. If you are thinking of going to 0.92 anytime soon, help us out w/
> > the testing if you can.  This period while we are putting up release
> > candidates is the best time for trying stuff out because if you find
> > an ugly bug, it'll be fixed pretty tout de suite
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message