hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ANN: The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:27:45 GMT
All are important correctness fixes, except for HBASE-5163 which would make
0.92 Jenkins build more stable - considering the build takes around two
hours.

Maybe we can declare Jenkins build #243 which is ongoing as 0.92.0 ?
Assuming it passes.

Just my two cents.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:

> Are all 6 required? If not, which ones are and how important are they
> in your opinion so that they need to be in 0.92.0? If haven't looked
> over them in too great details but you seem in the know so that's why
> I ask #lazyfriday.
>
> Regarding their "fix version", they should have been committed under
> 0.92.1 AFAIK (and changed if there's a new RC) but no biggie.
>
> J-D
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since last Sunday, 6 checkins have gone in under 0.92.0 section in
> > CHANGES.txt
> >
> > I am fine with re-categorizing them to go under 0.92.1
> >
> > Or should we evaluate the 6 checkins ? I personally think the current
> 0.92
> > Jenkins build would be more robust than RC3.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I've been testing this under heavy write loads and I also looked at
> >> replication. On previous RCs I did many read tests and AFAIK that
> >> didn't change so I didn't go through that again. I think this is a
> >> solid release, and 0.92.1 will take care of bugs that didn't make it
> >> in time.
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> > The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download:
> >> >
> >> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-3/
> >> >
> >> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
> >> >
> >> > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0 and zookeeper 3.4.2.
> >> >
> >> > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a wagon-load of new features
> >> > including coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format,
> >> > distributed log splitting, etc.  There's been > 660 fixes since 0.90.
> >> > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5
> >> >
> >> > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this
> >> > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> >> >
> >> > There is no migration necessary.  A shutdown and restart after putting
> >> > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart
> >> > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work).  That said, once you have moved
> >> > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has
> >> > been made.
> >> >
> >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0?  Take it for a spin.
> >> > Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by Martin Luther King Day, January
> 16th,
> >> 2012.
> >> >
> >> > Yours,
> >> > The HBasistas
> >> >
> >> > P.S. This candidate is looking pretty good.  If you are thinking of
> >> using 0.92.0
> >> > any time soon, we would suggest that you dig in now and try it.
>  Thanks.
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message