hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:03:27 GMT
> I am similarly concerned about the deadlocks in distributed log splitting
> that Jimmy and Prakash have been working on.


> If distributed long splitting is off by default, I'm +1.


This seems reasonable.

It's going to take some time to shake out all the corner cases.
 

Best regards,


  - Andy


Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)


----- Original Message -----
> From: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download
> 
> I am similarly concerned about the deadlocks in distributed log splitting
> that Jimmy and Prakash have been working on.
> 
> If distributed long splitting is off by default, I'm +1.  If it is going to
> be default on, then I'd prefer getting those bugs bumped up to
> blockers fixed and then spinning another rc.
> 
> Jon.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>  HBASE-5099, 5100 were integrated after this RC.
>>  Also, Prakash has new patch for HBASE-5081.
>> 
>>  I think a new RC should be more appropriate for the first 0.92 release.
>> 
>>  Cheers
>> 
>>  On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
>>  >wrote:
>> 
>>  > Now that both Hadoop 1.0 and ZK 3.4.2 have been released I think we
>>  > should ship with them.
>>  >
>>  > Apart from that I'm +1. I even let a LoadTester job run on my 15 
> nodes
>>  > during the holidays (287 hours now) and it's still crushing my 
> cluster
>>  > as much as it did in the beginning without any failure.
>>  >
>>  > J-D
>>  >
>>  > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>  > > The third hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for 
> download:
>>  > >
>>  > >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-2/
>>  > >
>>  > > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by 
> jenkins.
>>  > >
>>  > > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0rc3 and zookeeper 3.4.2rc0.
>>  > >
>>  > > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a raft of new features
>>  > > including: coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file 
> format,
>>  > > distributed log splitting, etc.  There's been > 600 fixes 
> since 0.90.
>>  > > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5
>>  > >
>>  > > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this
>>  > > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
>>  > >
>>  > > There is no migration necessary.  A shutdown and restart after 
> putting
>>  > > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling 
> restart
>>  > > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work).  That said, once you have 
> moved
>>  > > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition 
> has
>>  > > been made.
>>  > >
>>  > > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0?  Take it for a 
> spin.
>>  > > Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by January 3rd, 2012.
>>  > >
>>  > > Happy Holidays.
>>  > > Yours,
>>  > > The HBasistas
>>  > >
>>  > > P.S. If you are thinking of going to 0.92 anytime soon, help us 
> out w/
>>  > > the testing if you can.  This period while we are putting up 
> release
>>  > > candidates is the best time for trying stuff out because if you 
> find
>>  > > an ugly bug, it'll be fixed pretty tout de suite
>>  >
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
> 

Mime
View raw message