hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ANN: The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:01:21 GMT
Ah, course. Well, it ran the test ignoring the profile anyways, and failed. But as I said,
that is the first time I ran it on my MacBook Air and not sure if that needs tweaking, Let
me run it again, just to confirm.

On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Ted Yu wrote:

> Lars:
> runAllTests profile is only in TRUNK.
> 'mvn clean test' should be the command for 0.92
> 
> Cheers
> 
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Lars George <lars.george@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I checked the MD5 and SHA-1 hashes, which are all OK, I did get an error
>> though on my MBA (see below). Assuming this is only me I am also +1.
>> 
>> Here is the test failure:
>> 
>> ...
>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperACL
>> 2012-01-15 01:52:46.002 java[49123:1903] Unable to load realm info from
>> SCDynamicStore
>> 2012-01-15 01:52:48.715 java[49123:1e807] Unable to load realm info from
>> SCDynamicStore
>> Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 44.246 sec
>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperMainServerArg
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.376 sec
>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperNodeTracker
>> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.129 sec
>> 
>> Results :
>> 
>> Failed tests:
>> testCyclicReplication(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestMasterReplication):
>> Waited too much time for put replication
>> 
>> Tests in error:
>> testSimplePutDelete(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.TestMasterReplication):
>> Cluster already running at
>> /Users/larsgeorge/Downloads/hbase-0.92.0-rc3/hbase-0.92.0/target/test-data/7956128b-c9e3-4473-b3a2-c2faf140fb99/dfscluster_80ddefc2-e1be-477f-b761-df1ed883fc31
>> 
>> Tests run: 1037, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8
>> 
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 2:57:25.455s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Sun Jan 15 01:53:33 CET 2012
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 108M/213M
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [WARNING] The requested profile "runAllTests" could not be activated
>> because it does not exist.
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.10:test (default-test) on
>> project hbase: Failure or timeout -> [Help 1]
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
>> -e switch.
>> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>> [ERROR]
>> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
>> please read the following articles:
>> [ERROR] [Help 1]
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
>> 
>> Did I run this wrong? What about the "runAllTests" warning above?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Lars
>> 
>> On Jan 8, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Stack wrote:
>> 
>>> The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-3/
>>> 
>>> I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
>>> 
>>> This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0 and zookeeper 3.4.2.
>>> 
>>> As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a wagon-load of new features
>>> including coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format,
>>> distributed log splitting, etc.  There's been > 660 fixes since 0.90.
>>> See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5
>>> 
>>> See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this
>>> release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
>>> 
>>> There is no migration necessary.  A shutdown and restart after putting
>>> in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart
>>> from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work).  That said, once you have moved
>>> to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has
>>> been made.
>>> 
>>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0?  Take it for a spin.
>>> Check out the doc.  Vote +1/-1 by Martin Luther King Day, January 16th,
>> 2012.
>>> 
>>> Yours,
>>> The HBasistas
>>> 
>>> P.S. This candidate is looking pretty good.  If you are thinking of
>> using 0.92.0
>>> any time soon, we would suggest that you dig in now and try it.  Thanks.
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message