Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 754EC7A06 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41210 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2011 23:46:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41174 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2011 23:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41166 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2011 23:46:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:46:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.169] (HELO mail-yx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.213.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:46:00 +0000 Received: by yenq10 with SMTP id q10so5916266yen.14 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:45:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.79.38 with SMTP id h26mr15583523yhe.39.1323128740187; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:45:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.4.16 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:45:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jonathan Hsieh Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:45:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300513168d0db004b360eaf6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf300513168d0db004b360eaf6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Stack, I won't be able to take a look at these until Wednesday. Jon. On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Stack wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > > Roman and I did some commit auditing on 0.92 and found that there are > > several patches in the 0.90 branch but not in the 0.92 branch or release > > candidate. I haven't looked at any of these deeply yet but I'd think we > > should deal with these regressions before 0.92 goes out. > > > > Let us know if you are going to look into it soon Jon, else I'll take a > gander. > St.Ack > > (Thanks for doing this) > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // jon@cloudera.com --20cf300513168d0db004b360eaf6--