Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
References: 
 <CAF63A-ao_EY=WCn7_xYfOJmPigXU-whA-qrhyMCGe0UACLe3FQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGpTDNehFJJGcnswKx-f42rWdMc0c_NhHmbhatoFxqMeSB5uZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF63A-avQPtaM9ZmKCxmk-vCmCq+aUPVp+BhdunVX-rxezcEgg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1322705724.59189.YahooMailNeo@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:15:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Reply-To: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Subject: Re: security/configuration-related error when trying to create a
 table
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF63A-avQPtaM9ZmKCxmk-vCmCq+aUPVp+BhdunVX-rxezcEgg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="-1963939083-1572962555-1322705724=:59189"

---1963939083-1572962555-1322705724=:59189
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Glad this was just a false alarm.=0A=0AIf you do try out security features,=
 or believe you see errors as a consequence of them going in, I am very int=
erested in hearing about it, even if a false alarm, and will take care of i=
t if there is a real issue.=0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A=0A=A0 =A0- Andy=0A=0A=
=0A=0A=0A=0A>________________________________=0A> From: Mikhail Bautin <bau=
tin.mailing.lists@gmail.com>=0A>To: dev@hbase.apache.org =0A>Sent: Wednesda=
y, November 30, 2011 6:04 PM=0A>Subject: Re: security/configuration-related=
 error when trying to create a table=0A> =0A>Figured this out -- this was a=
 false alarm. I accidentally overrode my=0A>hbase jar with the hbase test j=
ar, so it was legitimately complaining about=0A>not being able to find a va=
lid hbase-default.xml.=0A>=0A>Thanks!=0A>--Mikhail=0A>=0A>On Wed, Nov 30, 2=
011 at 4:15 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:=0A>=0A>> Do =
you have an hbase-default.xml file somewhere? It should only exist=0A>> in =
the jar now, it's not in conf/ anymore.=0A>>=0A>> J-D=0A>>=0A>> On Wed, Nov=
 30, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mikhail Bautin=0A>> <bautin.mailing.lists@gmail.com> =
wrote:=0A>> > Hello,=0A>> >=0A>> > I am getting the following when trying t=
o create a table from the=0A>> > load-tester tool ported from 0.89-fb (http=
s://reviews.facebook.net/D549=0A>> ).=0A>> > It is weird that configuration=
 instantiation fails given that it=0A>> succeeded=0A>> > earlier in the too=
l's workflow. Does anyone know why are we=0A>> instantiating a=0A>> > new c=
onfiguration in HadoopUser's constructor, and why it could fail as=0A>> if=
=0A>> > it had a different classpath without the normal hbase-default.xml o=
n it?=0A>> >=0A>> > Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.=
io.IOException:=0A>> > java.lang.RuntimeException: hbase-default.xml file s=
eems to be for and=0A>> old=0A>> > version of HBase (null), this version is=
 0.93-SNAPSHOT=0A>
---1963939083-1572962555-1322705724=:59189--