Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1321565504.20571.YahooMailNeo@web65505.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
References: 
 <CADfYSXTt4ES6hiduBA0_b5RYzQYALw_ns71AJpjXHMf6dxjCeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgG1Tn4ODruWr3RPGiVrkE0N+QiF1CgYcd8bORQ7S433ug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADfYSXST_GKPJzJK=gsrzDH-2--nN7dFTk5gxGtwr8VhHSRWxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62xyUX9Qp1mEwmYbw6aP6RgGAw1RrzF-rw_V94B0VKQDPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1321565504.20571.YahooMailNeo@web65505.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:38:09 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62zW-8-FfKes=AdFU+V0JRGCqJ6VuTw=UtjpULXJum=gmg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Security patches: HBASE-2742 and HBASE-3025
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426dd46afba404b1f509fe

--f46d04426dd46afba404b1f509fe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

My assumption is that 0.92 RC0 would be released after:
1. 2742 and 3025 get checked in
2. we have a good Jenkins build after that

We can iron out build issues between #1 and #2 above.
HadoopQA would make this easier by telling us which tests may fail.

This is my personal opinion.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
> Integration of security is holding up an 0.92 RC.
>
> I'd like clean Hudson reports too, but that seems thin justification.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>   - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Security patches: HBASE-2742 and HBASE-3025
> >
> > I am still going over changes in 2742. But I don't expect to find much.
> >
> > 2742 and 3025 haven't gone through HadoopQA yet.
> > 0.92 and TRUNK builds on Jenkins have been unstable lately. I think we
> > shouldn't make a successful build further.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Gary Helmling <ghelmling@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>  Yes, the ZK authentication in 2418 is the final piece of the puzzle.
> >>
> >>
> >>  On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>  > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Gary Helmling
> > <ghelmling@gmail.com>
> >>  wrote:
> >>  >> Hi all,
> >>  >>
> >>  >> I intend to commit the following patches for HBase security to the
> >>  >> 0.92 branch and trunk at the end of day today:
> >>  >>
> >>  >> HBASE-2742: Provide a secure RPC engine for HBase
> >>  >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/1991/
> >>  >>
> >>  >> HBASE-3025: Coprocessor based simple access control
> >>  >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/2041/
> >>  >>
> >>  >> If you have not reviewed and want to, or feel like you need more
> > time,
> >>  >> please take a look today or speak up now.
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>  > Am reviewing now.
> >>  >
> >>  > That would leave Andrew's secure zk issue to complete our security
> > story?
> >>  >
> >>  > St.Ack
> >>  >
> >>
> >
>

--f46d04426dd46afba404b1f509fe--