Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E800398B4 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36848 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2011 19:27:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 36808 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2011 19:27:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 36800 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2011 19:27:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:27:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ghelmling@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:27:25 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so1251711wyi.14 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uiU/KOa7D2mvgdlz+/eiF6ZowV79WvSMDAz3mq5zkE4=; b=HDmveG7gFU1HAkDcePtD2c4MFCbq8siIzn8Mf/fm+R1v0/J5Ai8r+euct3gT0Zvpju FgJDAP4BYQE7m99p39TCk697Ehp5BFBzW14zXie0+DmLSZtdbwPFi7xPxhLqbZpSRdF8 lr8jSSGyQ5p6GtLTR9Asq6bPK+cYBPZcPI2jM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.14.29 with SMTP id c29mr836753wec.13.1321471625606; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.39.72 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:27:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7E79E015-5B19-471A-93CE-C8E9002B2B20@hortonworks.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:27:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase .92 maven artifacts compiled against different releases of Hadoop From: Gary Helmling To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > IMO a Hbase release should not include Hadoop JARs. Then, it would > require a Hadoop installed to run. And it would use the Hadoop > 'hadoop' CLI to start. > I agree with not bundling Hadoop for RPM/deb packages where the package management system can take care of the dependencies. I'm -1 on excluding the Hadoop jar from the tarball distribution, however. Forcing newcomers to download a Hadoop distribution in addition to HBase, just to be able to start up a local _stand-alone_ HBase instance for testing is shooting ourselves in the foot as a project. We already get flak for being too complicated to run, let's not add to it. --gh