Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ADCA9892 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76060 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2011 18:08:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 76019 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2011 18:08:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 76011 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2011 18:08:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:08:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.41] (HELO mail-fx0-f41.google.com) (209.85.161.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:08:20 +0000 Received: by faas10 with SMTP id s10so2559230faa.14 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:07:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FXq3jA6ZYl/cnmfkgjb0O1AQYxQC3TCrqqytBJGCI2U=; b=qVTpffDNm9fLcqSbIyvLML8KPLAMauYvxbtfdKHCAm1xk0cJO3WNdhcoSPMAFAqbb9 4u788SpPANtZ3Sfj5+PRfdsAuyOpoqYh2mZN1EnS0MLPfeHLGrF9yuMXwhWNJb1yWWSy GJvxMX4x5vvRqjSIM+omAtkESWgw8RCcNYQ44= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.110.1 with SMTP id hw1mr7771439obb.38.1321466879042; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:07:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.12.134 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:07:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7E79E015-5B19-471A-93CE-C8E9002B2B20@hortonworks.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:07:58 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: H3sGEDCS6pieL2Ah9ECeJSjr9gc Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase .92 maven artifacts compiled against different releases of Hadoop From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> No, that is not what I proposed. =A0I proposed having different test pro= file to test against different Hadoop releases. >> Ultimately, HBase published pom will have one major version of Hadoop ar= tifact as an dependency. =A0Quote from my own words: >> >>>>>>>>>> I recommend that one HBase release should be certified for one m= ajor release of Hadoop to reduce risk. > > I see this as neither practical, nor desirable. A proper place for any ki= nd > of stack validation is outside of HBase (be it Bigtop or your company's > distribution). I'd rather see HBase itself (as a project) be as Hadoop > agnostic as possible. > I'm w/ Roman on this one. We've been trying with a good while to move away from being tied to a single hadoop version. St.Ack