Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D435E986D for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 05:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85863 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2011 05:23:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85831 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2011 05:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 81470 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2011 05:16:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:45:04 +0530 From: Ramkrishna S Vasudevan Subject: RE: Time for 0.90.5 In-reply-to: X-Originating-IP: [10.18.1.33] To: dev@hbase.apache.org Reply-to: ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com Message-id: <76AC3FF341B148478D9D249AF7B13B82@china.huawei.com> Organization: HTIPL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4862 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcyqZJ1VyjN74rEUQoyhgG4oTO0kPAAA0iKw X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Stack If we are taking a release cut for 0.90.5 then we need to test rolling restart with the patch for HBASE-4352.(Timeout monitor refactor) Regards Ram -----Original Message----- From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 10:20 AM To: dev@hbase.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for 0.90.5 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > It's just nice to look at that as a line in the sand between stuff > we're confident in and stuff we haven't tested significantly yet. A > couple big things went in after what you're running, including > HBASE-3777 (new connection pooling stuff), a couple more split-related > bugfixes, etc. We should focus our 90-branch testing on those newer > pieces. > Agreed. I'll run check on rolling upgrade form 0.90.4 --> 0.90.5 on a cluster at least. St.Ack