hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: on HBase 1.0
Date Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:54:51 GMT
I agree with Stack.
>From 0.94 to 1.0, the numbering makes sense.

Let's first get 0.92 out the door :-)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > It's possible a release of 0.20.20X (X=5 I think) as Hadoop 1.0 is
> imminent.
> >
> > The Hadoop 1.0 release is an acknowledgement of reality -- 0.20 branch
> is in production at many places.
> >
> > I know we agreed to separate HBase versioning from Hadoop versioning,
> but if we continue to number HBase as 0.X after there is a Hadoop 1.0,
> there is an implicit marketing message that we feel HBase is not as ready
> as Hadoop.
> >
> >
> > I propose that we consider, if and when Hadoop 1.0 is released, that we
> release HBase 1.0 off of the 0.92 branch. A subsequent release off of trunk
> could be 1.1 or 2.0 at the discretion of the RM and community consensus.
> >
>
> Agreed.  Was thinking 0.94 could e be 1.0.0 since its getting a load
> of 0.89-fb branch forward-ports.   Would have to come out right after
> 0.92 though.
>
> St.Ack
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message