hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: on HBase 1.0
Date Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:03:07 GMT
Yes, that is a problem which should give us motivation to make 0.94 stable
in near future.

It is also natural because there're more people using/developing hadoop
compared to HBase.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> > From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: on HBase 1.0
> >
> > I agree with Stack.
> > From 0.94 to 1.0, the numbering makes sense.
>
> You did not address the issue of having only 0.X HBase in release while a
> 1.0 Hadoop is in release. Do you see that as a problem?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>    - Andy
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message