hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: proper pace for JIRA integration
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:00:35 GMT
> There will be some deployment of .22 in big shops as far as I know. 

Who are these "big shops"?

AFAIK, compared to 0.20.x or 0.23, 0.22 has a number of regressions.

We need to assess how healthy 0.22 is. How much time/attention should the HBase community
pay to what might be a DoA/ignored release? Or is that in fact the case (that it is DoA...)?

Best regards,

  - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)

>From: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>
>To: dev@hbase.apache.org; Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 12:51 PM
>Subject: Re: proper pace for JIRA integration
>On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>> There was also some work to insure that we compile and run against 0.22, but I don't
think anyone would actually deploy and use such a configuration.
>There will be some deployment of .22 in big shops as far as I know. Whether they
>will also deploy HBase .92 or something else on top of it -- that
>remains to be seen.
>Well, my question was basically about what post .21 release of Hadoop HBase
>.92 might be interested in supporting out of the box and it looks like
>the answer is
>.22. I'll setup an integration validation job over here and will
>report the results:
>    http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/view/Hadoop%200.22/
>(btw, once Bigtop 0.2.0 gets release we'll have a trunk that can
>support 0.20.205 + .92).
>Of course, we can all benefit from more integration tests available in
>Bigtop, so if the community
>could donate some of the integration tests, that I'm sure folks tend
>to have in various
>forms, that'll make it even easier for us to assess how healthy .92 is.

View raw message