hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <tdunn...@maprtech.com>
Subject Re: Maven 2 vs. 3
Date Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:30:22 GMT
It's ok.  It confuses me, too.

I keep wondering how I knew some of these things enough to have commented as
well as the other Ted does.  Then I notice that it was him.

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Doug Meil <doug.meil@explorysmedical.com>wrote:

>
> Oops... Sorry, the "Ted" in my message was aimed at Ted Yu.
>
>
>
>
> On 10/9/11 6:19 PM, "Doug Meil" <doug.meil@explorysmedical.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Hey Ted, we were working on a ticket a few months ago and I was having
> >trouble because I was working with Maven 3 and you said it wasn't
> >supported (or didn't work well).
> >
> >If that's not the case anymore I'll update the book.
> >
> >
> >
> >On 10/9/11 4:31 PM, "Ted Dunning" <tdunning@maprtech.com> wrote:
> >
> >>The book is already slightly out of date.
> >>
> >>Maven 3 is better and handles almost all maven 2 builds pretty
> >>seamlessly.
> >> I don't see a problem with moving forward rather than back.
> >>
> >>On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jesse Yates <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> So the book says to use Maven 2, rather than Maven 3. Is it just that
> >>>the
> >>> docs are out of date or was there some discussion I'm missing? The only
> >>> thing I could find was that we should actually use maven 3 (
> >>> http://search-hadoop.com/m/V9sBo1Kxzab1).
> >>>
> >>> I feel like Maven 3 is solid at this point (I've been building trunk
> >>>with
> >>> it
> >>> pretty consistently) and is pretty standard as far as industry usage.
> >>>
> >>> Should I just put in a Jira for updating docs?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jesse Yates
> >>>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message