hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Yang <ey...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Date Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:23:54 GMT
At Hortonworks, we have tested Hadoop 0.20.205.0 with HBase 0.90.4 with patch:

HBASE-4415, HBASE-4498, HBASE-4523, HBASE-4535

At the same time, the same patches also work for HBase 0.92 and Hadoop
0.20.205.0
combination for both secure and unsecured installation.

regards,
Eric

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Amandeep Khurana <amansk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it makes sense to have 0.92 as the release for 0.20.205. There is no
> real advantage in having an interim release with not many added features
> just because there is a new Hadoop release out there that we think works
> better. Also, it'll give time to test out stability of 0.20.205.
>
> Just my $0.02...
>
> -ak
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We've been testing security features proposed for 0.92 with 0.20.205 with a
>> patch to 205 to make testing easier (not needed for users). 0.92 is a good
>> candidate to be "the release" for 0.20.205.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> >From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>> >To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>> >Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:48 PM
>> >Subject: Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
>> >
>> >Shall we wait for MAPREDUCE-3206 to be resolved ?
>> >
>> >Meanwhile, let's work on 0.92
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >
>> >On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey devs,
>> >>
>> >> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
>> >> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
>> >> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
>> >> just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
>> >>
>> >> My concerns are:
>> >>
>> >>  - Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's
>> not
>> >> even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
>> >> started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
>> >>  - Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
>> >> 0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
>> >>  - Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect.
>> Can't
>> >> be
>> >> too bad tho.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
>> >>
>> >> J-D
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message