hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug Meil <doug.m...@explorysmedical.com>
Subject Re: Maven 2 vs. 3
Date Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:21:03 GMT

Oops... Sorry, the "Ted" in my message was aimed at Ted Yu.




On 10/9/11 6:19 PM, "Doug Meil" <doug.meil@explorysmedical.com> wrote:

>
>Hey Ted, we were working on a ticket a few months ago and I was having
>trouble because I was working with Maven 3 and you said it wasn't
>supported (or didn't work well).
>
>If that's not the case anymore I'll update the book.
>
>
>
>On 10/9/11 4:31 PM, "Ted Dunning" <tdunning@maprtech.com> wrote:
>
>>The book is already slightly out of date.
>>
>>Maven 3 is better and handles almost all maven 2 builds pretty
>>seamlessly.
>> I don't see a problem with moving forward rather than back.
>>
>>On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jesse Yates <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> So the book says to use Maven 2, rather than Maven 3. Is it just that
>>>the
>>> docs are out of date or was there some discussion I'm missing? The only
>>> thing I could find was that we should actually use maven 3 (
>>> http://search-hadoop.com/m/V9sBo1Kxzab1).
>>>
>>> I feel like Maven 3 is solid at this point (I've been building trunk
>>>with
>>> it
>>> pretty consistently) and is pretty standard as far as industry usage.
>>>
>>> Should I just put in a Jira for updating docs?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jesse Yates
>>>
>


Mime
View raw message