hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug Meil <doug.m...@explorysmedical.com>
Subject Re: Maven 2 vs. 3
Date Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:19:58 GMT

Hey Ted, we were working on a ticket a few months ago and I was having
trouble because I was working with Maven 3 and you said it wasn't
supported (or didn't work well).

If that's not the case anymore I'll update the book.



On 10/9/11 4:31 PM, "Ted Dunning" <tdunning@maprtech.com> wrote:

>The book is already slightly out of date.
>
>Maven 3 is better and handles almost all maven 2 builds pretty seamlessly.
> I don't see a problem with moving forward rather than back.
>
>On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jesse Yates <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> So the book says to use Maven 2, rather than Maven 3. Is it just that
>>the
>> docs are out of date or was there some discussion I'm missing? The only
>> thing I could find was that we should actually use maven 3 (
>> http://search-hadoop.com/m/V9sBo1Kxzab1).
>>
>> I feel like Maven 3 is solid at this point (I've been building trunk
>>with
>> it
>> pretty consistently) and is pretty standard as far as industry usage.
>>
>> Should I just put in a Jira for updating docs?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jesse Yates
>>


Mime
View raw message