hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Strange performance behavior of SingleValColumnFilter
Date Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:34:18 GMT
We found that even with many columns, and even when the filter matches the first column, SKIP
is still faster than NEXT_ROW.
So either the reseek is extremely inefficient, or there is something else at play.

It might be worthwhile to have StoreScanner upon SEEK_NEXT_ROW try the next N KVs (maybe N=10
or 20 or even bigger) to see if we
get to the next row, and only if we didn't reach the next row do the reseek.

________________________________
From: lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>; lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Strange performance behavior of SingleValColumnFilter

Maybe it even makes sense. When the scan is limited to one column and there is only one version,
SKIP would skip to the next row.
But 10x slower for NEXT_ROW seems extreme.



________________________________
From: lars hofhansl <lhofhansl@yahoo.com>
To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 3:49 PM
Subject: Strange performance behavior of SingleValColumnFilter

We have been doing some performance testing on HBase filters. One outcome was HBASE-4626 (which
I fixed and committed yesterday night).

Now we found a rather strange behavior with SingleColumnValueFilter. On our test cluster it
is 10x slower than ValueFilter, even when we restrict the scan to just the one column we are
filtering on and set filterIfMissing to true.
We are not seeing that with HBase in local mode, which points to some additional activity
on the FS, which in HDFS would be slow compared to a local FS.


Indeed it turns out the problem goes away when we replace all NEXT_ROW with SKIP in SingleColumnValueFilter.filterKeyValue
the performance is *much* better (on par with ValueFilter).


We're using something pretty close to trunk for our tests.
The tables are pretty wide, only one version of each cells (and freshly major compacted).


I do not know this part of the code that well (yet) and was wondering if somebody could chime
in. Maybe this is related to HFileV2?

I do recall there was something done to optimize reseeks. Generally I would have expected
NEXT_ROW to be a major performance improvement.

Any ideas, comments, pointers?

Thanks.

-- Lars

Mime
View raw message