Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGpTDNfv15PCSzCX819t2fiM=FdgadywQjwCpS7roKdceABjAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALte62xRHhzsNPkZxvusd8wgaFJy1wAeDgja=MVbHGG6rLT+Yg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGpTDNfv15PCSzCX819t2fiM=FdgadywQjwCpS7roKdceABjAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:55:37 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62yLtxHXUs4Bsf7S5mEX-nV6PmjW=7f95AvB696aLouthg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: backporting HBASE-3777 to 0.90
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649869ce4cf0004ae03425e

--0016e649869ce4cf0004ae03425e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

One reason for my endorsement is that it would take 0.92 quite some time to
reach the level of stability of 0.90.4
I really think HBASE-3777 would benefit HBase users a lot, and reducing
potential future inquiry about connection-related issues.

Of course, backporting increases the amount of work for validation of 0.90.5
But I think it is worth it.

My two cents.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:

> I'm -0 at the moment, it's a big patch to include in a point release.
>
> I'm glad the work was done tho because it means those interested (like
> me) can directly patch it in and test it (at my own risk).
>
> J-D
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Bright Fulton has volunteered to backport HBASE-3777 to 0.90
> > I endorse his effort.
> >
> > If you have comment(s), please share.
> >
> > I will open a new JIRA for this effort if this motion passes.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>

--0016e649869ce4cf0004ae03425e--