Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C416775E1 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 06:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40324 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2011 06:50:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 39699 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2011 06:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 39690 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2011 06:50:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:50:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.169] (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:49:59 +0000 Received: by iagv1 with SMTP id v1so6822898iag.14 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PLCA5h6PIChXFgQ8J8TwlA+YzsiMDycbSdDVtqUITDI=; b=GP/dnl8T+BeXKDXaTM28Sc9SVvcYK8ZbEyu7MYgZo6zvjCOKLbevh8ACr5J40GudJp wZxi57P0tlWGTN2UV5To33H3G9RzP+gNiEWlSfvf2vjUxBiW+6pVCgIaDeiZVbRjfqNX HR4BXvdm4vtpdZhSbEgyI77UDTdZ7dFbsyA2Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.28.154 with SMTP id m26mr5191078ibc.49.1315118978642; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.251.143 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:49:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E62B56A.2000301@dehora.net> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:49:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal From: Ryan Rawson To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We thought about it earlier, but single machine needing to come back up to restore didnt seem like a good idea. -ryan On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Mathias Herberts wrote: > On Sep 4, 2011 1:39 AM, "Bill de h=D3ra" wrote: >> >> On 02/09/11 19:06, Stack wrote: >>> >>> What do folks think? >> >> >> Not putting the log into hdfs seems like a good idea. > > I was somehow thinking the opposite as it makes irrecoverable machine > failures much more problematic. What makes you say it's a good idea? >