Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ghelmling@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcMMgHNFyjw-mNQ8q8uJQnxZkiwSY-zuNxOkhPznSVL_DeATw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgGJuwMKcR+pF5hUJ1=kcJSv3JsQGb7LLzb=bP1frBfk1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADfYSXQUprY63V+=W0z7i87QidhABL4AwzTMbHgsUEB6SAOb9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgHNFyjw-mNQ8q8uJQnxZkiwSY-zuNxOkhPznSVL_DeATw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:49:23 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CADfYSXRO9JcEyxT+WUE9eH1xZwz7OFUoiteeWcjMfrHVz2i-EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another
 BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]
From: Gary Helmling <ghelmling@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fb52f8d637a04ac5d90a3

--0016367fb52f8d637a04ac5d90a3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The secure RPC engine would still have to be split off into a separate tree,
since there are some classes that derive from the SASL support and token
authentication in secure Hadoop.  Can't break compilation of the non-secure
profile.  If there's a way to add an extra source tree in a profile, that
could work.

My impression of maven was that it's more "regulated" than that, and that
modules were the blessed way of doing multiple source trees.  But I'll try
some experiments.  Any additional pointers are appreciated.


On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Gary Helmling <ghelmling@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was going to start a thread on modularizing pre-0.92, but given that's
> > there's no actual patch ready, only a JIRA (HBASE-4336), that seems
> > premature.  We can race and see how long it takes to put something
> together,
> > then call a vote if it's ready before we've branched.
> >
>
> Could you do build against hadoop security as a profile (witness the
> 0.23 and 0.22 profiles)?  Then you wouldn't have to move everything
> for 0.92... just make sure 0.92 and security work?
> St.Ack
>

--0016367fb52f8d637a04ac5d90a3--