Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 259AA88F5 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19232 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 20:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 19078 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 20:21:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 19070 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2011 20:21:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 20:21:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 20:21:35 +0000 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so1498639qyk.14 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S9A7hOCMSCMZoDzmY2FnwPzShAL6Ca7zqIyWeQuztQE=; b=NzSMwYmeOs+CVQuZTowQd73sDKnMb2Xqc4Z+5FbtF4I1DEngccS2us/nENpAcAbM4L /CuREJBdESpg2DDsvjIR8q1cQN3s3ArNrA+JORwHhGK1hWieq+ou4rg2rL7EknU4yv6f PYAShTTVOggLzKB5JZGXxdyRmY6E/Xxw263L0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.27.83 with SMTP id h19mr1919768qac.291.1315081274719; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.11.84 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1315016013.88826.YahooMailNeo@web65514.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:21:14 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Bd7oe11Nps8u6AdKjvEEqK8BSA0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> So, would the ASF allow incubation of a web server product, for >> example nginx (which is a direct httpd competitor)? > > Yes, why not? > You are assuming: > - competition is bad > - community is impartibel > Can we move the 'competition is good', etc. discussion to another thread preferably off the dev list. I'd suggest we refocus this thread on how to respond to the Accumulo proposal (or whether to respond at all), since thats what we 'know'. I think it'd be useful correcting at least the 'unlikely tos' with pointers to committed code. Code overlap, if any, can be addressed when the code drop happens. St.Ack