Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E00EF8FA9 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58983 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 13:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58812 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 13:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58803 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2011 13:41:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 13:41:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.18.222.48] (HELO smtp2.4emm.com) (69.18.222.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 13:41:15 +0000 Received: from EX2K7VS03.4emm.local ([192.168.160.203]) by HUB02.4emm.local ([192.168.161.133]) with mapi; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:40:53 -0400 From: Doug Meil To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:40:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal Thread-Index: AcxqPxmIP4a0Y1B+R2SOBZmhKuLlbw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 That's a good point. But the fact that Apache HTTPD is implemented in C, and Tomcat is in Java I think is material. While they compete for web server users, they have very different implementations. If ASF had two active Java webserver communities and codebases (e.g., "Tomcat" and "Timdog") I think that it would be a bit confused. On 9/3/11 3:55 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" wrote: > >You ommitted Tomcat which is all about HTTP. They are not the same, yet >compete for web server users, i.e. Community. >