Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of
 jrottinghuis@ebay.com)
DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
  h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Date:
   Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID:References:
   In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language:
   X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage:
   x-ems-proccessed:x-ems-stamp:Content-Type:
   Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-CFilter;
  b=TMDIRmPACWbF597LzJbNGurQxP9ELcFS8AEsNQS8gXWgzjhrVlshYztv
   532zepvMQ/inZiU+kp7VgsFfYPOO0j6Rb7jigPOk+D0EJFciM4rgDCEkZ
   PUx9+Kouk6/GAQn;
From: "Rottinghuis, Joep" <jrottinghuis@ebay.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:02:53 -0600
Subject: RE: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another
 BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]
Thread-Topic: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another
 BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]
Thread-Index: Acx2NvANOFEM0tCDRoSau13jIuun+gA+egXgAAQzLuA=
Message-ID: 
 <C25CE95B9064B543BAF2058027F5691F95F1933CFB@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgGJuwMKcR+pF5hUJ1=kcJSv3JsQGb7LLzb=bP1frBfk1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<C25CE95B9064B543BAF2058027F5691F95F12E9DAA@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com>
 <CADcMMgEbsLAGz8M_ijqcNp55HUaz0FPkO6A+1nbgsTt65SWeSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <C25CE95B9064B543BAF2058027F5691F95F1933C92@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <C25CE95B9064B543BAF2058027F5691F95F1933C92@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Michael,

Should the version in the pom on the 0.92 branch point to 0.92.0-SNAPSHOT?
If so I can file a bug and supply patch for same.
Or are you updating that only when you get ready for a release?

Thanks,

Joep
-----Original Message-----
From: Rottinghuis, Joep [mailto:jrottinghuis@ebay.com]=20
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:02 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: RE: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another =
BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]

Thanks St.Ack!

Joep
-----Original Message-----
From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:12 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another =
BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]

I was sort of waiting on a clean build to TRUNK before branching.  I think =
we should be there in next hour or so.  I'll branch this evening or by tomo=
rrow morning.  That OK w/ you Joep?

St.Ack

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep <jrottinghuis@ebay.com> =
wrote:
> Any update on the 0.92 branch getting cut?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joep
> ________________________________________
> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack=20
> [stack@duboce.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:42 PM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another=20
> BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]
>
> I'd like to propose branching friday week, the 16th. =A0Hopefully that=20
> will might get folks to focus on these last outstanding issues (of=20
> which there are quite a few).
>
> Thereafter we need to work on stabilization which I'm sure will turn=20
> up at least one bug, maybe two (smile). =A0Stabilization will run for a=20
> good while I'd say and will take some effort all around. =A0Only bug=20
> fixes should go into 0.92 branch (J-D might have to tie me to the=20
> mast).
>
> Should we discuss in a separate whether to pull in security?
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrot=
e:
>> I also agreed at the time to hold off refactoring the build for Maven mo=
dules and supporting RPC engine variants. I would still have the same opini=
on if not for recent events.
>>
>> How much work remains for 0.92? If more than a few week's worth, then a =
parallel refactor of the build could happen, with a final merge step.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> =A0 =A0- Andy
>>
>> On Tue Sep 6th, 2011 12:02 PM PDT Gary Helmling wrote:
>>
>>>> Seems like committing it will disrupt the build and src tree layout.
>>>> Gary was holding off till we branched but 0.92 branching is taking=20
>>>> too long.
>>>>
>>>> + Lets branch this friday, or next?
>>>> + And or, run a vote on whether we should commit security now=20
>>>> + before
>>>> we branch or after
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>This is getting off topic for the current thread, so I'll open a new=20
>>>thread to take a vote on converting trunk back in to maven modules.
>>>This is what would be necessary to integrate the various security bits.
>>>
>>>The last discussion we had on this was on the dev list at the end of=20
>>>May/beginning of June:
>>>http://search-hadoop.com/m/iXZmd2aZwBE1
>>>
>>>I agreed as much as anyone that we should hold off until after=20
>>>branching
>>>0.92 in order to avoid the disruption of moving the entire source=20
>>>tree around. =A0So I have been holding off on this on my own discretion=
=20
>>>and any delay sits mostly with me.
>>>
>>>Of course, that was three months ago and we still haven't branched.=20
>>>In hindsight, if we were aware how long the 0.92 process would go on,=20
>>>I think the thread might have reached a different conclusion. =A0In any=
=20
>>>case, I think it warrants another discussion.
>>>
>>>--gh
>>
>>