Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09132898D for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97131 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2011 23:24:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 97083 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2011 23:24:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 97075 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2011 23:24:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:24:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.169] (HELO mail-yx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.213.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:24:14 +0000 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1377674yxn.14 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZKMzlXiRZ9hl2hJ1byV5vrBzdypvqdQ9NO301r0icjE=; b=E/yqnPowIXHcrDShV8BnvBvdq1MmkP1Bm4a7u3L2LIls9oOfIvXsLp8lx5sflabyR+ AMkKdHSk53Dlc9iIYAOVO/cakGhDo3IeHn9bSi2BSwddLQwhaFJu2kriuGQ1U/plt8cm 00OOBCwYxpi/yTxep2bkzLrj+sCutxHsYxNUE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.197.129 with SMTP id ek1mr1338584icb.324.1313709833899; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.219.129 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:23:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: HBASE-1730 and HBASE-4213 From: Ted Yu To: dev@hbase.apache.org Cc: Subbu M Iyer , nileema.shingte@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303bf986fccf6f04aacfe765 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf303bf986fccf6f04aacfe765 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Due to lack of coordination, HBASE-1730 and HBASE-4213 try to implement the same feature at roughly the same pace. I want to hear your opinion on how we should plan to move forward with these two JIRAs. One possibility is to provide two policies, one accommodating each JIRA. But that requires even more work. It would be nice if we can have some performance numbers for both implementations on comparable cluster(s). Cheers --20cf303bf986fccf6f04aacfe765--