Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88E487409 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91638 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2011 04:21:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 90674 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2011 04:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 75722 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2011 04:04:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nileema.shingte@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.169 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ljfy+wlcbOM0wiC9EVeGdMNuLTpON0oxrnNsbV3oULE=; b=T9GH+NXdI0hukY6u7y7CPySWGCJS3mxgRMtM3SNi9AsVb8Ir5N5uVcBnhbIjYxLhdo YH4rh7Rmzw++0LgmC5vZr2PFOJnWFTP3HDftvK9OXvJoitgLbTeont/iKl2bza5OHi6c /GXeY3Bt1wM5W6rrDcBFGqtrSOI2nNXRz8uwQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <2A78CDF7-0039-44C5-8FF4-EEE1ADA1E4D9@gmail.com> From: nileema shingte Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:03:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBASE-1730 and HBASE-4213 To: Stack Cc: dev@hbase.apache.org, Subbu M Iyer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305e25f9c98de604aad3d250 --20cf305e25f9c98de604aad3d250 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Guys, Thank you for starting a thread to bring this to closure. I have only read Subbu's description of the approach. I believe the main difference is that 4213 uses the zookeeper to maintain if all regions have the updated schema and reopening the regions is the RegionServer's responsibility, where as 1730 it happens in memory in the Master, and reopens are issued by the master. I have not read through the patch submitted on 4213, so am not sure if it allows you to configure the number of regions that reopen at a time. Apart from this I think that 1730 is a subset of 4213 and if 4213 agrees more with the HBase ideology, we should definitely use that as a patch. In either case, I will respond to the comments on the Jira and upload detailed description for the same. Thanks, Nileema PS: I am new to HBase and was working on this during my internship. I wasn't aware of other efforts towards this. Apologies if I created any inconvenience. On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > Surely they do. > > If they summarize their plan, it would be easier for others to make a > decision. > > > > > > I'd tend to think its their decision to make. We are just here to > cheer them on (smile). > > Subbu you going to come to the hackathon > (http://www.meetup.com/hackathon/) or meetup on Monday > (http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/events/28518471/)? You Nileema? > > Good stuff, > St.Ack > --20cf305e25f9c98de604aad3d250--