hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacek Migdal <ja...@fb.com>
Subject Re: prefix compression and HBASE-4027
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:04:48 GMT
It will still have ByteBuffer, but the data might be no longer uncompressed there.

>From the description of your JIRA I don't see any problem there.

Thanks for letting me know.


From: Li Pi <li@cloudera.com<mailto:li@cloudera.com>>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:50:38 -0700
To: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com<mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com>>
Cc: Microsoft Office User <jacek@fb.com<mailto:jacek@fb.com>>, <dev@hbase.apache.org<mailto:dev@hbase.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: prefix compression and HBASE-4027

As long as HFileBlocks have a ByteBuffer where the data is stored, it should be fine.

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com<mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com>>
Jacek / Pi:
I hope you two can discuss the implications of Jacek's proposal in HBASE-4218 w.r.t. Pi's
current work in HBASE-4027.
Agreeing on the access pattern is an important aspect.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message