Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13AB2637B for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44067 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 43986 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 43978 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:14:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:14:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.41] (HELO mail-qw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:14:39 +0000 Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so3863686qwa.14 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dPCXtp4HkP7vmrN6uxeVpgQd2zuVhx88c75dGCf0l/M=; b=uifad3p/Ysx999ILKDrFuE4Hgyz6cPrXWdVHcGH4+tqTwNV4e8nQUSYChoqRbd84ny pxWi3oRMgm9pSLOXnYw/jQpxBF0bVWQKqbYY63CL7bpHt0YTYHcG+mhWfr3WjTbi6iXR exq+5Ra6Yt7FFcoM41qfN3PpSLfOv+oMZrAWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=E9Wlksce/Oyy9+0XbkNR5Gc+JHg7uj/TGeARNY8rHkw353kXeAqrr3v+sqnLrv3lbg CG+onay1Zgyx7eQtgvY5UFCjN2tHrq5w74euk1DfnXBSTanHTRCdPJUxeC8Eq64e+oTo +VxGvJEKF05WqPJIvss1KpSpIdMZkPvAmczdA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.182.211 with SMTP id cd19mr5866929qab.41.1308071658568; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.19.135 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:14:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:14:18 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9NPAbS832VwapvtHygXdULUbrnc Message-ID: Subject: Re: ConcurrentSkipListMap performance in the MemStore From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 See this J: http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2011/03/avoiding-full-gcs-in-hbase-with-memstore-local-allocation-buffers-part-3/ St.Ack On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Is there an issue with garbage generated from using CSLM in the MemStore? >