hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HBASE 3904
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:49:29 GMT
That's my interpretation after reading it again as well.
So I will put HBA.createTable() back to being synchronous again for 3904.
Cheers
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:

> I don't want to be thick, but I don't see where in that jira the fact
> that createTable became synchronous was stated as an issue. All I see
> is that it became affected by all the other region in transitions as
> well, which is orthogonal to our discussion.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3744 has been fixed.
> >
> > FYI
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Can you point to the issue where Todd did the revert?
> >>
> >> Thx,
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > J-D recently expressed the idea of changing behavior of
> HBA.createTable()
> >> to
> >> > be consistent with its javadoc.
> >> > Meaning, HBA.createTable() should be synchronous.
> >> >
> >> > Todd reported an issue which resulted in reverting my changes that
> caused
> >> > HBA.createTable() to be synchronous.
> >> >
> >> > I want to see if we can reach consensus on how HBASE 3904 should be
> >> handled.
> >> >
> >> > We have 3 options:
> >> > 1. making HBA.createTable() to be synchronous in TRUNK
> >> > 2. pass initial region count in HTD
> >> > 3. add new method in HBA for synchronous table creation
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message