hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Release 0.90.3 soon?
Date Mon, 16 May 2011 18:31:03 GMT
Run the unit tests, try it on a handful of machines, basically just
make sure it's usable.

J-D

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume release manager has to be a committer. So, although I want to help
> ...
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> We cut cut a 0.91 now as Todd suggests but would need a release
>> manager to run the release.
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Barney Frank's request for help brought me back to this discussion.
>> > When would 0.91 release come ?
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am looking forward to this 0.91 release.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > When would 0.91 branch be created ?
>> >>> > We should reduce the number of open critical bugs for 0.90 - each
>> such
>> >>> > issue
>> >>> > would soon be integrated to 3 branches after 0.91 branch is created.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry, I should have been clear that I would imagine 0.91 would be a
>> "dev
>> >>> release" series like 0.89. That is to say, there would be no 0.91
>> branch,
>> >>> just a few "snapshot style" releases with minimal pre-release testing
>> to
>> >>> get
>> >>> us in shape for 92. These releases would never have point releases done
>> on
>> >>> top (and thus not need to have changes backported to them one
>> released).
>> >>>
>> >>> Consider it another name for an extended release candidate period for
>> >>> 0.92.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Todd
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > Maybe we should do an 0.91 dev release tout de suite? Folks
who
>> want
>> >>> > > 3777 and coprocessors and the other nice stuff can then help
us
>> bake
>> >>> > > towards 92 ?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Todd
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2011, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > > >> After discussion below, I wonder if 0.92.0RC would
come out
>> before
>> >>> > > 0.90.4
>> >>> > > >> I hope that's the case - we're looking forward to
coprocessor
>> which
>> >>> > > wouldn't
>> >>> > > >> be in 0.90.x anyway.
>> >>> > > >>
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Plan is to put up a 0.92.0 'soon', in the next week or
so.  I'm
>> not
>> >>> > > > sure when 0.90.4 will see light of day.  There's a good
few
>> blockers
>> >>> > > > and criticals but if a few of us have a go at them, we'll
knock
>> it
>> >>> out
>> >>> > > > tout de suite (This is what I'm working on at mo).
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Good stuff,
>> >>> > > > St.Ack
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > --
>> >>> > > Todd Lipcon
>> >>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Todd Lipcon
>> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message